This blog is hosted on Ideas on EuropeIdeas on Europe Avatar

Latest

Government Regulation & Its Effects On Higher Education Performance: What’s The Deal?

Kazakh National University. Photo credits: Kazakh National University on Facebook

Danagul Yembergenova

In today’s world of higher education, it should come as no surprise that the goal is always to move up – in any way possible. In other words, increase enrollment, increase prestige, increase retention and graduation, increase funding, increase interest, etc. With that in mind, what would you say if we told you that government regulatory provisions in some countries – even countries where higher education is valued and respected – are actually inadvertently working to hinder higher education performance?

It would certainly come as a shock, would it not? Well, according to an article recently published in Industry and Higher Education, it’s becoming increasingly clear that – at least in the case of the country of Kazakhstan – government regulatory provisions are actually hindering innovation at the higher education level. Now, this is obviously a serious problem and a major challenge that needs to be addressed in order to ensure that the higher education institutions within Kazakhstan are able to perform at their highest level.

In this short blog, we’re going to take a look at this article in particular, and we’ll point out some interesting findings. This study was conducted by Danagul Yembergenova from the University of Geneva, Switzerland, Ajit Jumar from Japypee Business School, India, and Ikhfan Haris from Universitas Negeri Gorontalo, Indonesia.

 

The Root of The Study

The researchers and authors involved in this study took a keen interest to the government regulatory provisions in the country of Kazakhstan and examined just how these initiatives put forth by Kazakhstan’s State Programme for Education Development in hopes that they would spur economic development, actually ended up resulting in poor higher education performance. The initiatives discussed in the study were implemented within a 9 year period between 2011 and 2020.

The authors say, “In this paper, we concentrate on the function performed by universities – that of innovation. In Kazakhstan, the country of focus in this study, strengthening the potential of scientists and researchers who can generate knowledge and innovate in ways that are useful for economic prosperity has always been a pressing issue.”

From there, the researchers point out that in 2014, Kazakhstan set out on a mission to become one of the top 30 most developed economies in the world. In order to set themselves up on a pathway to achieve this ambitious goal, they launched a series of initiatives and made some substantial investments into their higher education institutions. From 2000 to 2011 alone, the country increased its research and development expenditure from 6 to 51 billion tenge.

With this increased investment came the formation of the State Programme for Education Development 2011-2020. In this programme, universities were tasked with implementing new tasks and policies that would regulate the ways in which universities and higher education institutions went on to pursue innovation. According to the researchers, this is where things began to fall off track.

They say, “despite these aspirations and the initiatives introduced in SPED 2011-2020, various agency problems existed in the government’s regulatory provisions in Kazakhstan, affecting universities’ performance. For example, due to informational asymmetry, the government could not effectively determine an efficient policy plan. In particular, the government set precisely stated and extremely enthusiastic expectations for outputs in the policy (that change with every changing minister). However, not only did the research-oriented activities have low measurability; the universities also lacked the resources to implement the indicated demands. Besides, the government tried to programme the universities’ activities by not giving them sufficient autonomy to carry out the targeted necessary actions. Consequently, the imposition of specific goals on universities without sufficient resources and autonomy caused severe goal conflicts”.

They go on to say, “as a response to these regulatory inconsistencies, universities behaved opportunistically”. Authors found that the universities’ actions involved shrinking, cross-subsidisation and the opportunistic pursuit of prestige. Therefore, the opportunistic developments that occurred were related to the ex-post situations and the problem of moral hazard, which reduced their effectiveness, including the quality of outputs and research.

Once the researchers determined that there is an emerging mess of interrelated issues and challenges at hand, they set out to provide suggestions for government agencies to understand exactly what their role is when it comes to regulating innovation.

 

The Suggestions

With that said, the researchers provided some suggestions to help mitigate these challenges:

  • “The first essential for the government is to provide universities with less enthusiastic and less precisely stated goals. To reduce goal conflicts and align universities with national objectives, the government should employ an outcome-based financing mechanism and link it to those goals.”
  • “Moreover, the government should adjust its legal frameworks… This is because, if there is no legislative backing for universities to develop commercial market activities, they will not be interested in performing better and generating innovations, thereby contributing to economic development.”
  • “The issue of underprivileged and underfunded universities should also be addressed through the use of appropriate input-oriented funding mechanisms. In particular, the government should transfer funds directly to students and from them to universities.”
  • “Finally, the government needs to co-ordinate and integrate policies across regional and sectoral departments. Such integration needs to extend beyond merely changing the policy variables; there must also be a provision for shared government structures.”

 

What It All Means

Now that we’ve reached the end of our review, it should be quite clear in terms of what this all means. Evidently, there is an incoherent combination of enthusiastic indicators of universities’ research activities, which emphasise effectiveness and productivity, and an inherently path-dependent framework of behaviour-based rules that promote compliance.

However, authors conclude saying that “while regulatory mechanisms and resource dependency are very important factors, and have promoted conflicts of interest and thereby created conditions for universities to behave opportunistically”, authors say the agency theory that has been used to conduct the study does not take sufficient account of the role of leadership and the nature of its interests. In particular, authors assert that, “in higher education in Kazakhstan, it might not be government regulations and economic productivity alone that have guided the actions of universities”.

From here researchers point out since the Ministry of Education appoints rectors, how the political cycle, re-election pressures or other leadership-related factors could have led both the strategic and tactical management of universities, because some universities performed better than others despite their less beneficial resources.

What do you think about this research study? Share your thoughts with us down below. We’d love to hear all about what you think.

 

 Dr. Danagul Yembergenova is a change management analyst at Tengizchevroil Chevron. She is a former doctoral researcher at the University of Geneva. Her research expertise transcends the boundaries of higher education governance, change, organizational management and economic advancement in general. Her specific topics of interests include higher education governance reforms, principal-agent relationship, change and outcomes. 

 

COMMENT

Recent Articles

Emerging Security Technologies and EU Governance: Actors, Practices and Processes

Published on by | No Comments

What role do technologies play in European integration? How EU governance of security technologies is changing and how does it differ from other major players? These and other questions are examined in a recent book Emerging Security Technologies and EU Governance: Actors, Practices and Processes, edited by Antonio Calcara, Raluca Csernatoni and Chantal Lavallée. In […]

Big Science and Research Infrastructures in Europe

Published on by | Comments Off on Big Science and Research Infrastructures in Europe

What are Research Infrastructures and what roles do they play in the European integration process? These and other questions are addressed in recently published book Big Science and Research Infrastructures in Europe, edited by Katharina Cramer and Olof Hallonsten. In this Q&A with Europe of Knowledge blog, they explain origins, key concepts and findings of […]

Virtual ECPR Knowledge Politics and Policies 2020

Published on by | Comments Off on Virtual ECPR Knowledge Politics and Policies 2020

What is the role of knowledge today when almost every aspect of our lives is affected by the global pandemic? What changes does this radically new situation bring to politics and policies of science, technology and higher educattion?  These and other questions were discussed at the Knowledge Politics and Policies Section of the first virtual […]

Germany’s Science Production Engines: Research Universities and Institutes Competing for Research Funding, 1950–2010

Published on by | Comments Off on Germany’s Science Production Engines: Research Universities and Institutes Competing for Research Funding, 1950–2010

Jennifer Dusdal As the world’s third largest producer of scientific knowledge, scientists in Germany publish more articles than those in any other country, except for the U.S. and China. Germany is the birthplace of both the modern research university and the independent extra-university research institute. Germany’s dual-pillar research policy, developed over the twentieth century, we […]

Responsible University: Exploring the Nordic Context and Beyond

Published on by | Comments Off on Responsible University: Exploring the Nordic Context and Beyond

What is the ‘responsible university’? What does it mean for universities to address the Sustainable Development Goals? And what is specific about universities in the Nordic countries? These are some of the questions addressed in a new book ‘Responsible University: Exploring the Nordic Context and Beyond’, edited by Mads P. Sørensen (Aarhus University, Denmark), Lars […]

Higher Education in the 21st Century: Changes and Challenges Ahead

Published on by | Comments Off on Higher Education in the 21st Century: Changes and Challenges Ahead

What are the major changes and transformations affecting higher education worldwide? And what are the challenges for higher education systems and institutions in the 21st century? Encyclopedia of International Higher Education Systems and Institutions is a major reference work providing comprehensive answers to these and other questions. Over the past years, many researchers from around […]

Rescaling a Think Tank Model at European Level

Published on by | Comments Off on Rescaling a Think Tank Model at European Level

Tatyana Bajenova In the recent article Rescaling expertise in EU policy-making: European think tanks and their reliance on symbolic, political and network capital (Bajenova 2019) that appeared in the Globalisation, Societies and Education Journal, Tatyana Bajenova has examined the strategies which think tanks (TTs) employ to influence EU decision-making. Unlike some recent studies of European […]

Hopes, beliefs, and concerns: narratives in German and Portuguese universities regarding Brexit

Published on by | Comments Off on Hopes, beliefs, and concerns: narratives in German and Portuguese universities regarding Brexit

Tim Seidenschnur By studying higher education as an institutional field, we focus on an area where European integration has in general been regarded as positive. However, the current period is characterized by basic disagreements among the political parties and the electorates about the preferred nature of the future European order, which causes uncertainties and tensions. […]

How do we manage knowledge? Let us count the ways

Published on by | Comments Off on How do we manage knowledge? Let us count the ways

Sofya Kopelyan Nothing can keep a genuine community of scholars from academic discussions – neither a malfunctioning projector, nor a shortage of sockets, nor hard chairs from the Communist times. Even more so when discussions centre on the governance of knowledge as the key to economic growth and public well-being. This year’s Knowledge Politics and […]

Conceptualizing major institutional change in higher education

Published on by | Comments Off on Conceptualizing major institutional change in higher education

Emma Sabzalieva Institutions and major institutional change Institutional theories and concepts offer valuable insights into stability and incremental change within institutions. In higher education, Clark’s (2004) notion of a ‘steady state of institutional change’ (169) neatly encapsulates this idea. However, far less consideration has been given to the transformative potential of higher education both to […]

  • wordpress com stats
  • Recent Posts

  • Tags

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • UACES and Ideas on Europe do not take responsibility for opinions expressed in articles on blogs hosted on Ideas on Europe. All opinions are those of the contributing authors.